====== Proposal Writing ====== Acquiring 3rd Party Funds and Projects [...] 27-29 January 2021 (online) by TU Berlin /data/workspace/000_research/09_courses/1_project_proposal ===== - Proposal ===== * Should not mention that substantial parts of the project are done. * Ask/find the funding agentcy's reviewer protocols. It should not be secret. But don't contact the reviewers directly (sometimes their name are listed in the call). * quality criteria * Idea: * Relevance: solve needs or problems * Feasibility: don't need to apply for the full length of the funding, if it can be done in a shorter time. * Selling point: * lift up from sota, outstanding performance feature. Think patent. Measurable criteria (publication, citation). * Realistic work program * 3-4 month packages. * Management, events. * Common thread: attract reviewer to read. * Conciseness: short, less is more. * Prove of * Excellence: best paper, prices, publications at high ranking venues. * Sustainable: long term effect. ==== - Exercise: reading call ==== * Host organization can offer exceptional condition (contact, dissemination, commercialization). * What you bring to host organization: I'm the **gateway to German scientific community** because I have work here for a long time in projects with large consortium. ==== - Who are the reviewers ==== * Ask the agency when having to select given reviewers in different fields. Reviewer guidance, checklist. * EIT rawMaterial: upscaling project proposal, guidance and template. * They read abstract and financial statement (make sense, evently distributed, reasonable --> spotting hornesty of the consortium). * Make sure project successfully completed. * Ask yourself, would you put money in this project? Partners own funding, partial funding. * Talk about problem or reviewer will assume the worst. * See screenshot: /data/workspace/000_research/09_courses/1_project_proposal/Reviewers ===== - Day 2 ===== ==== - Steps to prepare a proposal ==== * General suitabiliy check * Brainstorm about the idea * Look for collaborators that meet the required competence * Submission plan: study the call, * proposal structure: * devide roles * write application: check style to be unified. * review: internal, external ==== - Elements of the proposal ==== * Objective: not method * short messages in 3-4 bullet points. * positive communication. * when defining scope, issues not fouces can be mentioned positively by talking about the big picture and highlighting the focussed parts and their impacts. * Output: IMpact, technologz assessment level (TAL) * Deliverable: research data, method, technologies * ... * Disemination * ... * Finance plan: **must be consistent with WP description**. Inconsistency can be spotted and lost of credibility. ==== - Abstract ==== * max 20 words in a sentence * put important words first. * use bullet points (make it easier for reviewers). The length is limited by words not space. * use 2-3 keywords to connect to the call: eMobility, etc. * coherent of the writing: different topic in different section, by different partners. * Ask biz people to check the exploitation. Show that you understand what you are writing about. * The consortium must have the whole lifecycle (partner expertise) for knowlege transfering and competitiveness in business. ==== - OPossible example ==== * Linguee https://www.edacentrum.de/syena/de/content/benefit.htm