ISCO

• more generic: semantic, service domain. Chariot will deal more with device layer.
• Sahin: ISCO should focus on embedding hardware objects in software smart objects.
• FK: VDI drive ISCO to more service orchestration platform / domain. Project name was also updated accordingly.
• Sahin: still we want scalable middleware that meet the scale of HW devices.

CHARIOT

• Sahin: Scalable Middleware and application area.
  • Select application –> increase value of the project.
• FK: We turn our lab in to testbed, deploy in our building: workplace, factory. POC deployment.
• TD (think): something like Gent testbed.
• Marco: simulation of service (FK: for robotic usecase)

• Sahin: runtime env (WP2), iolite integrate simple, constrained device. On top we build jiac high lever servcie for more powerful, quality services (IO-Lite++) as outcome of the project.
  • IO-Lite bus / middleware (details on middleware).
• Sahin: usecase should focus on domain areas, which we can find partner and ad ourself. Implementing all scenarios are too much effort.
• Marco: the other usecase can be simulated.
• FK: bulding and industrie scale usecase. Some focus on industry 4.0, work place with robots (Can).
• Sahin: Industry 4.0 is about production pipeline, partly included robots (as machine not service robots).

GT-ARC work program * Advanced Tech research

• Basic research with close to reality application result.
• Scientific impact.
• Closed bmbf program.
• Applied research & dev program
• Cooperation with industry using previous projects.
• Open calls: bmbf, …, we have testbed, software component, etc, which can be used in your workpackage.
• GT-ARC Steering committee: Technological focus: smart city, cybersecurity

Project's shared goals, Strategic Outcomes and Assets“ - by Fikret/Can

ISCO

• CAN: isco assets extend DAI projects
• Sahin: Main outcome of ISCO should be fundamental outcomes: modeling smart city object, API.

  • Nils: VSDT focuses on service orchestration, we may extend the framework to smart object domain in ISCO.
  • Sahin: how to describe object?
    • Nils, Can: but this should be focus of chariot.
    • Sahin: abstract / description of object should be in the results of the project ISCO. All team, Nils, Johannes will have meeting with project carriers (?) to discuss smart object description.

  Chariot

• Robot integration should be side activity.

Strategic outcomes Publication

• Sahin: Fikret supports.
• Sahin: focus on main activity, project success.
• Sahin: encourage new project ideas, proposals.